Who Really Is Scott Herndon?

Scott Herndon wants your vote for Idaho Senate District 1.

But his record raises serious questions across the board:

Votes: He helped throw out a certified Clark Fork precinct result after the county prosecutor said the proper remedy was a court contest.

Judgment: He called a 13-year-old rape victim’s pregnancy “the opportunity to have a child… if the rape actually occurred.”

Services: He wants to abolish the property tax that funds local fire, ambulance, schools, and roads — while voting no on the state budgets that would have to replace them.

Taxpayers: He sued Sandpoint over a gun-at-concert policy, lost unanimously at the Idaho Supreme Court, and stuck local taxpayers with $300,000+ in legal costs.

Not safe. Not fit. Not my Idaho.

District 1 deserves leadership, not more conflict.

#NotMyIdaho #IdahoSenate #District1DeservesBetter #JudgmentMatters

Clark Fork Republicans elected Jensen Heisel, a 4th generation Clark Fork resident, as precinct committeeman with 54% on May 19, 2026.

On May 26, Deputy Prosecutor William S. Wilson put it in writing: the clerk had no authority to invalidate a candidate who won, and the proper remedy was a district-court contest.

Eleven days later, the Bonner County Republican Central Committee went into closed executive session and declared the seat vacant anyway.

Scott Herndon filed the challenge.

This is not about party procedure. It is about whether your vote counts once it has been certified.

If he will throw out a precinct result after the prosecutor says to go to court, why would District 1 trust him with the Senate?

#NotMyIdaho #ProtectTheVote #District1DeservesBetter

A 13-year-old girl. Raped by a family member. Forced to carry the pregnancy.

That was the scenario put to Sen. Scott Herndon during a January 16, 2023 Senate hearing.

His response?

“Some people could describe the situation… as the opportunity to have a child in those terrible circumstances, if the rape actually occurred.”

Read that again.

The “if the rape actually occurred” is part of the quote. It telegraphs disbelief of a child victim.

Herndon’s own Republican committee found the bill so extreme they killed it 8–1.

This isn’t a policy debate. This is judgment and empathy.

And it is exactly what voters need to know before giving Scott Herndon a vote on Idaho Senate District 1.

#NotMyIdaho #JudgmentMatters #IdahoWomen

Scott Herndon’s top promise is to abolish property taxes.

What he doesn’t say: Idaho schools still collect $404 million from that tax. Fire districts, ambulance districts, highway districts, and supplemental school levies depend on it too.

His plan? Replace it with state surplus and a spending freeze.

He even compared ending property taxes without a new rate to “going to the moon.”

Here’s the problem: your fire district is not NASA. Your ambulance service can’t wait for a moonshot.

And Herndon has already voted no on budgets for fire crews, Idaho State Police, NIC, and K-12 schools.

That is not a funding plan. That is a $404 million hole.

#NotMyIdaho #IdahoSchools #District1DeservesBetter

Scott Herndon took his personal grievance to court.

He wanted to carry a firearm into Festival at Sandpoint on city-leased property. The festival banned weapons. He sued.

The Idaho Supreme Court ruled against him unanimously.

The cost to local taxpayers: $300,000+.

Then, as a sitting senator, Herndon helped pass legislation to undo the ruling and reopen the issue — making taxpayers pay twice.

That’s not leadership. That’s using public office to relitigate a private loss.

As if one loss wasn’t enough, his own Republican Senate leader later reprimanded him for an editorial attacking fellow legislators, writing that colleagues “have taken their duties seriously, you have not.”

Even his own caucus noticed the problem.

#NotMyIdaho #TaxpayerWatch #District1DeservesBetter

Scott Herndon wants District 1 to trust him with schools, public safety, roads, and local services.

But his budget record shows the opposite:

• State police: NO
• Fire crews & fire suppression: NO
• K-12 schools: NO
• NIC & higher education: NO
• Roads & bridges: NO

This is not occasional opposition. It is a pattern.

Now he wants to abolish property taxes — the revenue stream that pays for local fire districts, school levies, ambulance services, and highway districts — while promising those services will be fine.

If he wouldn’t fund them from Boise, why would anyone believe he’ll protect them once the local tax is gone?

#NotMyIdaho #District1DeservesBetter #IdahoSchools

Scott Herndon asks District 1 to trust him with schools, public safety, local services, and election decisions.

But his record tells a different story.

Public records and contemporaneous reporting show repeated confrontations: a 2012 animal-cruelty citation after a neighbor’s dog was shot, trespass disputes, a confrontation at a church, graphic protest signs near schoolchildren, a lawsuit he lost unanimously at the Idaho Supreme Court, a reprimand from his own Senate leader, and a closed-door effort to overturn a certified precinct vote.

Not every incident resulted in charges. That matters.

But taken together, these incidents raise a serious question about temperament:

Do Idaho families need a senator who solves problems — or one who creates them?

#NotMyIdaho #ConflictFollowsHerndon #JudgmentMatters

In 2012, Bonner County sheriff’s records show Scott Herndon was cited for cruelty to animals after a neighbor’s black Labrador was shot.

According to the incident account summarized in contemporaneous reporting, the dog was shot in the back while running away. A deputy estimated the dog was roughly 80 feet from chickens and said it had not touched them.

This is not being presented as a conviction — the supplied records do not establish the final disposition. But the underlying incident and citation are fair questions for voters examining judgment and temperament.

A senator makes decisions under pressure, responds to conflict, and represents communities. District 1 deserves someone who exercises restraint and sound judgment.

#JudgmentMatters #NotMyIdaho

One difficult family situation does not define a candidate. But a documented timeline of repeated disputes, trespass issues, welfare involvement, and law-enforcement contacts deserves scrutiny when that candidate asks to make decisions about public safety, schools, families, and local institutions.

The records in Scott Herndon’s background include:

• A 2012 animal-cruelty citation
• A 2016 custodial dispute
• A 2017 Health & Welfare welfare check
• A 2019 sheriff response involving out-of-state visitors seeking contact with a teenager
• 2021 trespass and confrontation incidents

Some involved relatives. Some did not result in charges. Those distinctions matter.

So does the pattern.

District 1 should ask whether Scott Herndon’s record reflects steady leadership — or repeated conflict that draws in neighbors, churches, families, and law enforcement.

#ConflictFollowsHerndon #District1DeservesBetter

Churches should be places where tensions cool down, not escalate.

In April 2021, Bonner County deputies responded to Cowboy Church in Cocolalla during a dispute connected to broader family conflict. According to the sheriff’s report, church security believed Scott and Arlene Herndon were present to “menace” relatives. The report describes Scott Herndon as “verbally confrontational.”

The result was a one-year trespass order.

Reasonable people can face painful family disputes. But elected officials are expected to handle pressure with restraint, especially in community spaces.

This incident raises a straightforward question:

If Scott Herndon cannot de-escalate a family dispute at a church, how can District 1 trust him to manage conflict in the Idaho Senate?

#NotMyIdaho #JudgmentMatters

Every political movement has the right to speak in public spaces.

But leadership means asking: Should we, even if we can?

A former school administrator wrote that Scott Herndon-aligned protesters displayed large graphic images of dismembered babies, along a sidewalk used by 12- and 13-year-old students leaving school. Parents reported that children were frightened.

The response focused on the protest being legal on a public sidewalk.

That may answer the legal question.

It does not answer the leadership question.

District 1 parents expect elected officials to protect children from unnecessary trauma, not treat them as unavoidable collateral in an adult political fight.

Scott Herndon’s judgment failed those families.

#LegalIsNotResponsible #NotMyIdaho #IdahoFamilies

Scott Herndon’s political brand is defiance.

But voters should distinguish between courage and constant conflict.

Herndon’s record includes confrontations that drew sheriff responses, a church trespass, graphic protest signs near middle schoolers, a lawsuit against Sandpoint that the Idaho Supreme Court rejected unanimously, a formal reprimand from his own Senate leader, and a closed-door party process that threw out a certified precinct election result.

These are not isolated disagreements.

They show a recurring approach: escalate, litigate, condemn, and override institutions when they do not produce the result he wants.

Repeated disruption is not leadership.

#NotMyIdaho #District1DeservesBetter